Create a Decision Tree.

Each level of risk is thoroughly defined – Levels of risk should at least include: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk

Each level of risk is explained in terms of social validity for the client.

Each level of risk is defined. All three risk levels are included in decision-tree, and explained in write-up.

Levels of risk are mentioned, however, not thoroughly defined. One or more risk levels are missing or a component of definition is missing.

Behaviors within each level of risk are operationally defined (observable & measurable) with at least one non behavior definition given for each behavior.

Behaviors within all three levels of risk are operationally defined in observable & measurable terms.

An attempt has been made to define behaviors, however, definition is not observable & measurable.

Environmental variables are thoroughly explained in write-up. Each environment the FA would most likely be conducted in has been given consideration in terms of risk matched to the FA model.

Environmental variables are explained in the write-up.

An attempt has been made to explain environmental variables, however, only one environment is explained or explanations are missing key components.

FA methods are conceptually systematic (i.e., procedures are research-based and representative of the principles of ABA). In write-up, all procedures must be described in the language of ABA.

Each FA method is explained/defined in conceptually systematic terms.

An attempt has been made to explain FA methods in conceptually systematic terms, however, there are significant errors.

Ethical issues in each model are thoroughly detailed and explanations given for rationale for specific model was chosen in reference to our ethics code.

Ethical issues are explained in relation to each FA Model.

An attempt has been made to explain ethical issues in FA Models, however, significant issues are left out or not all models are included.