Philosophy Question

Meets length requirement, 4-6 pages

Does not meet length requirement

The essay presents a thesis statement that is exceptionally clear, focused, and effectively guides the reader through the main argument. It succinctly encapsulates the essence of the essay’s position and sets a strong foundation for the subsequent discussion. The essay maintains focus throughout.

The thesis statement is clear and focused, providing a solid foundation for the essay’s argument. It effectively outlines the main points of discussion and guides the reader, though there may be minor room for improvement in terms of precision or depth. The essay maintains focus, with few instances of tangential discussion.

The thesis statement is clear, providing a foundation for the essay’s argument. It outlines the main points of discussion. The essay mostly maintains a focus on the throughout, with some instances of tangential discussion.

The thesis statement lacks clarity and focus, making it difficult for the reader to discern the main argument of the essay. It may be too broad or vague, failing to provide clear guidance for the subsequent discussion. The essay struggles to maintain focus.

The thesis statement is unclear, unfocused, or entirely absent, hindering the reader’s ability to understand the main argument of the essay. Its quality is severely lacking, resulting in a disjointed or confusing presentation of ideas. The essay lacks focus with significant digressions and off-topic discussions that obscure the central argument.

The essay demonstrates sophisticated reasoning, with well-developed arguments that anticipate and address counter arguments effectively. Logical reasoning and critical thinking skills are consistently applied throughout the essay

The essay presents sound reasoning, with clear arguments supported by relevant evidence. Counter arguments are addressed. Reasonable inferences support conclusions and there is evidence of good critical thinking skills

The essay provides reasonable arguments, but there may be gaps in logic or limited consideration of counterarguments. Reasoning is generally sound but may lack depth or complexity.

The essay lacks coherent reasoning, with weak or unsupported arguments. Counterarguments are either ignored or addressed inadequately, and logical fallacies may be present.

The essay demonstrates little to no logical reasoning. Arguments are unsupported or based on flawed reasoning, and counterarguments are neither acknowledged nor addressed effectively.

The essay provides a wealth of relevant and credible evidence to support each argument. Sources are recent, authoritative, and predominantly from scholarly works. Evidence is effectively integrated into the essay and critically analyzed to strengthen the argument. Throughout, contains factual and accurate, detailed, current information to provide strong support for the thesis statement and the topics addressed in the body.

The essay utilizes a variety of relevant evidence to support arguments. While sources are generally credible, there may be occasional lapses in recency or authority but sources are primarily scholarly. Evidence is mostly well-integrated into the essay.

The essay presents evidence to support arguments, but there may be instances of insufficient or tangentially related evidence. The integration of sources could be improved for greater effectiveness. Most sources are scholarly.

The essay lacks sufficient or appropriate evidence to support arguments. Sources may be unreliable or irrelevant, and there is little analysis of evidence provided. There are few or no scholarly sources.

The essay relies heavily on anecdotal evidence or fails to provide any substantive evidence to support arguments. Sources, if any, are poorly integrated or lack credibility.

The essay demonstrates exceptional coherence, with seamless transitions between ideas and paragraphs. Each paragraph contributes to the overall coherence of the argument, and the flow of the essay enhances readability and comprehension.

The essay maintains coherence, with clear connections between ideas and paragraphs. Transitions are generally smooth, though there may be occasional lapses that do not significantly detract from the overall coherence.

The essay exhibits some coherence, but there are noticeable disruptions in the flow of ideas. Transitions between paragraphs may be abrupt or unclear, impacting the overall coherence of the argument.

The essay lacks coherence, with disjointed or unrelated ideas presented throughout. Transitions between paragraphs are often absent or ineffective, hindering the reader’s understanding of the argument.

The essay is highly disjointed, with little to no coherence between ideas or paragraphs. Transitions are nonexistent or confusing, making it difficult for the reader to discern the argument’s progression.

The essay maintains a consistently appropriate academic tone throughout, using formal language and demonstrating a thorough understanding of the subject matter.

The essay generally maintains an appropriate academic tone, with occasional lapses in formality or language usage. Overall, the tone is respectful and scholarly.

The essay’s academic tone is somewhat inconsistent or inappropriate at times. Language may be overly casual or informal, detracting from the overall professionalism of the essay.

The essay’s academic tone is largely inappropriate, with frequent lapses in formality or professionalism. Language may be colloquial or overly subjective, undermining the credibility of the argument.

The essay’s academic tone is consistently inappropriate or absent. Language is highly informal or unprofessional, and the essay may contain slang, personal opinions, or other elements that are not conducive to scholarly discourse.

Virtually free of punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.

Occasional punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.

Many punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors. Interfere with meaning in some places.

Punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors that hinder communication.

Severe punctuation, spelling and capitalization errors.

Contains properly formatted APA requirements, all 5 criteria: a. Length: 4-6 pages; b. 1-inch margins ; c. Double spaced; d.12-point Times New Roman font; e.Title page.

Contains mostly properly formatted APA (3 of the 5 criteria): a. Length: 4-6 pages; b. 1-inch margins ; c. Double spaced; d.12-point Times New Roman font; e.Title page.

Contains some properly formatted APA (3 of the 5 criteria): a. Length: 4-6 pages; b. 1-inch margins ; c. Double spaced; d.12-point Times New Roman font; e.Title page.

Contains a few properly formatted APA (2 of the 5 criteria): a. Length: 4-6 pages; b. 1-inch margins ; c. Double spaced; d.12-point Times New Roman font; e.Title page.

No APA formatting