INSTRUCTIONS:
Critical Evaluation of Leadership within an Organization – this is the part2 of the previous Belbin assessment. you may refer some leader role in Belbin report.
A critical evaluation of leadership style/s and ability to act as a strategic leader within the context of the organization. **see the criteria!!!
The organization chosen must be one in which you have been involved professionally. The paper should be based on public health practice and highlight personal learning.
****Evidence to support advancement in practice could take the form of documents, evidence of decision making, meeting notes, evidence of collaboration, development of guideline/protocols, copies of correspondence or appropriate reports. (Please note confidentiality must be protected). It should reflect past, present or future practice development in which you are undertaking a leadership role.
1. A brief description of the practice setting (practice setting should be described but not identified. Confidentiality of the setting and individuals within it must be protected). – registrar doctor at public hospital in Australia
2. A critical discussion of the advancement in practice and/or personal development with reference to relevant literature – refer to the attached lectures, and https://vimeo(dot)com/206458540/661b1b72ad
3. A critical discussion of leadership styles in relation to the leader’s role and influence on the project.
4. A critical discussion of the evaluation (prospective or retrospective) of project outcomes. – *** must see Project Management LinP (1).ppt – 7 steps in p.12
The word limit for Part 2 is 4,000 words exclusive of the reference list and appendices
at least 10 references + evidences supports in appendices!
Please read through the requirement and criteria!
write the paper as medical officer (doctor at hospital)
let me know if there’s anything required clarification.
please support the project you create with evidences (documents e.g. action plans from hospital / meeting notes, evidence of collaboration, development of guideline/protocols, copies of correspondence or appropriate reports
