Philosophy Question

  

Define and provide examples of positive and negative punishment: (B-6)

  • Compare and contrast positive and negative punishment. What is similar and what is different? (One paragraph)
  • Provide 1 example of positive punishment and 1 example of negative punishment. Be sure to include the discriminative stimulus for punishment, the behavior and the consequence/punisher. Come up with your own personal examples. (At least 2 paragraphs)
    criteria Exceeds Standards Meet Standards Does Not Meet Standards Criterion Score
    Writing Competency: Grammatical structure, APA formatting 1 pointExemplary spelling and grammar. Precise use of words with meaning clearly expressed. Feedback is supported by citing textual references from course materials in APA formatting. 0.5 pointsMinor errors in grammar or format. Acceptable, effective use of words and expression. 0 pointsErrors in grammar or format frequently obscure expression of thought. Ineffective wording, sentence structure, and expression. Score of Writing Competency: Grammatical structure, APA formatting,/ 1
    Critical Thinking: Skills evident: knowledge, comprehension, application, synthesis, evaluation 1 pointHigher order thinking is clearly evident and presented in a clear logical flow. Insightful interpretation, application, explanation, and/or critique 0.5 pointsSome higher order thinking is evident. Organization is logical. Links need strengthening. Most ideas are clearly interpreted, applied, explained and/or critiqued. 0 pointsBasic knowledge level information is presented. Organization is not evident. Interpretation, application, explanation and/or critique are not evident. Score of Critical Thinking: Skills evident: knowledge, comprehension, application, synthesis, evaluation,/ 1
    Participation: Interacts in positive, constructive, timely manner (responses to colleagues) Participation: Interacts in positive, constructive, timely manner (responses to colleagues) 1 pointAdds clear insights to ongoing discussion. Responds to a minimum of two others. Timely responses. Asks probing, constructive questions. Includes liberal and natural use of “encouraging statements.” 0.5 pointsContributes further thought to discussion in a timely way. Limited use of “encouraging statements.” Responds to two others. 0 pointsContribution is late and therefore not able to add to discussion. Respect of others is lacking. Does not respond to others. Post is late. Score of Participation: Interacts in positive, constructive, timely manner (responses to colleagues) Participation: Interacts in positive, constructive, timely manner (responses to colleagues),/ 1

    TotalScore of Discussion Board Rubric,/ 3